ProductPROPRO REQUIREDFC-PROD-002
Roadmap Claw
roadmap-claw
v0.2.0May 22, 2026Product roadmaps — milestone tracking, stakeholder communication, and priority visualization that survive contact with reality
A roadmap filled with fixed dates, quarterly commitments, and a feature list stretching 18 months isn't a plan—it's a lie wrapped in a Gantt chart that your engineering team already ignores. I structure roadmaps around outcomes and themes with Now/Next/Later horizons, maintain an internal technical version alongside the stakeholder-facing narrative, and define explicit entry criteria for the "Later" bucket so it doesn't become the graveyard of good intentions.
OpenClaw
Hermes
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
Windsurf
Aider
OllamaPRIMARY ACTION
Unlock with ProCOMPATIBLE WITH
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodex+4
8 compatible tools5 output formats
When to Use
- Translate vague ideas into implementation scope
- Prepare user stories with acceptance criteria
- Set realistic priorities before coding
- Create an actionable launch roadmap
Compatible Frameworks
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodexCursorWindsurfAiderOllama8 TOOLS
Quality Gates
- Explicit feature dependencies
- Timelines include risk buffers
- Launch criteria measurable and verified
- Critical path identified
- Capacity assumptions documented
5 GATES DEFINED
Expected Outputs
Now/Next/Later Roadmap with Confidence LevelsOutcome-to-Initiative Traceability MatrixStakeholder Communication Plan by AudienceRoadmap Update Cadence and Ritual DocumentEngineering Roadmap (Internal Technical View)
Native exports per tool
OpenClaw10 files
openclaw/AGENTS.mdopenclaw/SOUL.mdopenclaw/TOOLS.md+7 moreHermes5 files
hermes/skills/flickclaw/roadmap-claw/SKILL.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/roadmap-claw/references/workflow.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/roadmap-claw/references/quality-gates.md+2 moreClaude Code6 files
claude-code/CLAUDE.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/roadmap-claw/SKILL.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/roadmap-claw/references/workflow.md+3 moreCodex5 files
codex/AGENTS.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/roadmap-claw/codex.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/roadmap-claw/workflow.md+2 moreCursor3 files
cursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-roadmap-claw.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-roadmap-claw-workflow.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-roadmap-claw-quality-gates.mdcWindsurf3 files
windsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-roadmap-claw.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-roadmap-claw-workflow.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-roadmap-claw-quality-gates.mdAider3 files
aider/CONVENTIONS.mdaider/aider.mdaider/.aider.conf.ymlOllama4 files
ollama/Modelfileollama/system-prompt.mdollama/template.md+1 moreInstall Commands
Install the FlickClaw CLI, then select your AI agent framework below to get the correct install command.
Step 1: Install CLI (one-time)
npm install -g @flickclaw/cli@latestStep 2: Select Framework
OpenClaw
npm exec --yes @flickclaw/cli@latest -- install roadmap-claw --target openclawDownload as ZIP
Example Prompt
Try this prompt with Roadmap Claw to see what it can do:
Analyze the current feature set and prioritize the next 3 features by user impact and effort. Create Now/Next/Later Roadmap with Confidence Levels, Outcome-to-Initiative Traceability Matrix, Stakeholder Communication Plan by Audience with clear rationale.Example Output
IllustrativeWhat a typical Roadmap Claw report looks like:
# Roadmap Claw — Assessment Report **Project**: feature-prioritization **Context**: a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities **Generated**: 2026-07-10 ## Executive Summary The Roadmap Claw completed its review of feature-prioritization (a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities). 3 findings were identified with concrete remediation steps. All quality gates were verified before delivery. ## Findings | # | Severity | Area | Finding | Recommended Action | |---|----------|------|---------|-------------------| | 1 | **P1** | Scope | 12 features lack acceptance criteria | Define criteria and success metrics before scheduling | | 2 | **P2** | Dependencies | Team B blocked on Team A for 4 upcoming items | Resequence to parallelize independent work streams | | 3 | **P2** | Metrics | No success metric defined for Q2 initiatives | Add North Star metric and leading indicators per initiative | ## Quality Gates - [✓] Every initiative mapped to a strategic outcome, not just a feature - [✓] "Later" bucket has explicit entry criteria (not an uncurated dump) - [✓] Stakeholder-facing roadmap version differs from internal engineering version ## Outputs Generated - **Now/Next/Later Roadmap with Confidence Levels**: Included in the report above. - **Outcome-to-Initiative Traceability Matrix**: Included in the report above. - **Stakeholder Communication Plan by Audience**: Included in the report above. - **Roadmap Update Cadence and Ritual Document**: Included in the report above. - **Engineering Roadmap (Internal Technical View)**: Included in the report above. ## Validation - [x] All quality gates passed (3/3) - [x] 3 findings documented with severity and remediation - [x] 5 output sections generated - [x] Evidence collected and referenced --- *This is an illustrative example output from FlickClaw. Results vary based on project context.*
RELATED AGENTS