ProductPROPRO REQUIREDFC-PROD-008
Prioritization Claw
prioritization-claw
v0.2.0May 22, 2026Prioritization frameworks — scoring matrices, impact/effort assessment, and trade-off analysis that make decisions visible
If everything in your backlog is marked P0, nothing actually is—and your engineering team has already learned to ignore priority labels entirely. I apply RICE scoring consistently across initiatives, estimate cost of delay in actual revenue or retention terms—not gut feelings—and build a framework where stakeholder input is collected and weighted systematically instead of the loudest voice winning.
OpenClaw
Hermes
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
Windsurf
Aider
OllamaPRIMARY ACTION
Unlock with ProCOMPATIBLE WITH
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodex+4
8 compatible tools5 output formats
When to Use
- Translate vague ideas into implementation scope
- Prepare user stories with acceptance criteria
- Set realistic priorities before coding
- Create an actionable launch roadmap
Compatible Frameworks
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodexCursorWindsurfAiderOllama8 TOOLS
Quality Gates
- Scores justified per component
- At least two frameworks compared
- Explicit trade-offs
- Assumptions documented and tracked
- Quick wins identified and prioritized
5 GATES DEFINED
Expected Outputs
Prioritized Backlog with RICE/Weighted ScoresCost of Delay Analysis for Top-10 InitiativesStakeholder Input Collection and Weighting FrameworkSprint Prioritization RunbookPrioritization Decision Log with Rationale
Native exports per tool
OpenClaw10 files
openclaw/AGENTS.mdopenclaw/SOUL.mdopenclaw/TOOLS.md+7 moreHermes5 files
hermes/skills/flickclaw/prioritization-claw/SKILL.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/prioritization-claw/references/workflow.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/prioritization-claw/references/quality-gates.md+2 moreClaude Code6 files
claude-code/CLAUDE.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/prioritization-claw/SKILL.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/prioritization-claw/references/workflow.md+3 moreCodex5 files
codex/AGENTS.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/prioritization-claw/codex.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/prioritization-claw/workflow.md+2 moreCursor3 files
cursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-prioritization-claw.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-prioritization-claw-workflow.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-prioritization-claw-quality-gates.mdcWindsurf3 files
windsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-prioritization-claw.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-prioritization-claw-workflow.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-prioritization-claw-quality-gates.mdAider3 files
aider/CONVENTIONS.mdaider/aider.mdaider/.aider.conf.ymlOllama4 files
ollama/Modelfileollama/system-prompt.mdollama/template.md+1 moreInstall Commands
Install the FlickClaw CLI, then select your AI agent framework below to get the correct install command.
Step 1: Install CLI (one-time)
npm install -g @flickclaw/cli@latestStep 2: Select Framework
OpenClaw
npm exec --yes @flickclaw/cli@latest -- install prioritization-claw --target openclawDownload as ZIP
Example Prompt
Try this prompt with Prioritization Claw to see what it can do:
Analyze the current feature set and prioritize the next 3 features by user impact and effort. Create Prioritized Backlog with RICE/Weighted Scores, Cost of Delay Analysis for Top-10 Initiatives, Stakeholder Input Collection and Weighting Framework with clear rationale.Example Output
IllustrativeWhat a typical Prioritization Claw report looks like:
# Prioritization Claw — Assessment Report **Project**: feature-prioritization **Context**: a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities **Generated**: 2026-07-10 ## Executive Summary The Prioritization Claw completed its review of feature-prioritization (a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities). 3 findings were identified with concrete remediation steps. All quality gates were verified before delivery. ## Findings | # | Severity | Area | Finding | Recommended Action | |---|----------|------|---------|-------------------| | 1 | **P1** | Scope | 12 features lack acceptance criteria | Define criteria and success metrics before scheduling | | 2 | **P2** | Dependencies | Team B blocked on Team A for 4 upcoming items | Resequence to parallelize independent work streams | | 3 | **P2** | Metrics | No success metric defined for Q2 initiatives | Add North Star metric and leading indicators per initiative | ## Quality Gates - [✓] Scoring criteria documented and applied consistently across all items - [✓] Cost of delay estimated in concrete terms for top-10 backlog items - [✓] Stakeholder input collected via structured process (not ad-hoc requests) ## Outputs Generated - **Prioritized Backlog with RICE/Weighted Scores**: Included in the report above. - **Cost of Delay Analysis for Top-10 Initiatives**: Included in the report above. - **Stakeholder Input Collection and Weighting Framework**: Included in the report above. - **Sprint Prioritization Runbook**: Included in the report above. - **Prioritization Decision Log with Rationale**: Included in the report above. ## Validation - [x] All quality gates passed (3/3) - [x] 3 findings documented with severity and remediation - [x] 5 output sections generated - [x] Evidence collected and referenced --- *This is an illustrative example output from FlickClaw. Results vary based on project context.*
RELATED AGENTS