ProductFREEACCESS AVAILABLEFC-PROD-005
Feedback Claw
feedback-claw
v0.2.0May 22, 2026User feedback synthesis — signal extraction, theme clustering, and actionable insights from qualitative and quantitative data
Your NPS score means nothing if you can't trace it back to a specific product decision you made—or should have made—last quarter. I build a feedback taxonomy that tags every piece of input to features, sentiments, and customer segments, deduplicate the noise so you're not counting the same complaint five times, and close the loop so customers know their feedback actually landed somewhere.
OpenClaw
Hermes
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
Windsurf
Aider
OllamaPRIMARY ACTION
COMPATIBLE WITH
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodex+4
8 compatible tools5 output formats
When to Use
- Translate vague ideas into implementation scope
- Prepare user stories with acceptance criteria
- Set realistic priorities before coding
- Create an actionable launch roadmap
Compatible Frameworks
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodexCursorWindsurfAiderOllama8 TOOLS
Quality Gates
- Exhaustive categorization
- Patterns backed by multiple evidence
- Sentiment quantified with metrics
- Specific, actionable items
- Urgency levels justified with data
5 GATES DEFINED
Expected Outputs
Feedback Taxonomy and Tagging GuideSentiment Trend Report with Cohort BreakdownFeedback-to-Roadmap Traceability MatrixCustomer Follow-Up Queue (Prioritized by Impact)Quarterly Voice-of-Customer Synthesis
Native exports per tool
OpenClaw10 files
openclaw/AGENTS.mdopenclaw/SOUL.mdopenclaw/TOOLS.md+7 moreHermes5 files
hermes/skills/flickclaw/feedback-claw/SKILL.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/feedback-claw/references/workflow.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/feedback-claw/references/quality-gates.md+2 moreClaude Code6 files
claude-code/CLAUDE.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/feedback-claw/SKILL.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/feedback-claw/references/workflow.md+3 moreCodex5 files
codex/AGENTS.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/feedback-claw/codex.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/feedback-claw/workflow.md+2 moreCursor3 files
cursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-feedback-claw.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-feedback-claw-workflow.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-feedback-claw-quality-gates.mdcWindsurf3 files
windsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-feedback-claw.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-feedback-claw-workflow.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-feedback-claw-quality-gates.mdAider3 files
aider/CONVENTIONS.mdaider/aider.mdaider/.aider.conf.ymlOllama4 files
ollama/Modelfileollama/system-prompt.mdollama/template.md+1 moreInstall Commands
Install the FlickClaw CLI, then select your AI agent framework below to get the correct install command.
Step 1: Install CLI (one-time)
npm install -g @flickclaw/cli@latestStep 2: Select Framework
OpenClaw
npm exec --yes @flickclaw/cli@latest -- install feedback-claw --target openclawDownload as ZIP
Example Prompt
Try this prompt with Feedback Claw to see what it can do:
Analyze the current feature set and prioritize the next 3 features by user impact and effort. Create Feedback Taxonomy and Tagging Guide, Sentiment Trend Report with Cohort Breakdown, Feedback-to-Roadmap Traceability Matrix with clear rationale.Example Output
IllustrativeWhat a typical Feedback Claw report looks like:
# Feedback Claw — Assessment Report **Project**: feature-prioritization **Context**: a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities **Generated**: 2026-07-10 ## Executive Summary The Feedback Claw completed its review of feature-prioritization (a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities). 3 findings were identified with concrete remediation steps. All quality gates were verified before delivery. ## Findings | # | Severity | Area | Finding | Recommended Action | |---|----------|------|---------|-------------------| | 1 | **P1** | Scope | 12 features lack acceptance criteria | Define criteria and success metrics before scheduling | | 2 | **P2** | Dependencies | Team B blocked on Team A for 4 upcoming items | Resequence to parallelize independent work streams | | 3 | **P2** | Metrics | No success metric defined for Q2 initiatives | Add North Star metric and leading indicators per initiative | ## Quality Gates - [✓] Feedback items linked to specific features or feature requests - [✓] Sentiment trends tracked over time (not point-in-time snapshots) - [✓] Closed-loop follow-up completed for top-10 customer requests ## Outputs Generated - **Feedback Taxonomy and Tagging Guide**: Included in the report above. - **Sentiment Trend Report with Cohort Breakdown**: Included in the report above. - **Feedback-to-Roadmap Traceability Matrix**: Included in the report above. - **Customer Follow-Up Queue (Prioritized by Impact)**: Included in the report above. - **Quarterly Voice-of-Customer Synthesis**: Included in the report above. ## Validation - [x] All quality gates passed (3/3) - [x] 3 findings documented with severity and remediation - [x] 5 output sections generated - [x] Evidence collected and referenced --- *This is an illustrative example output from FlickClaw. Results vary based on project context.*
RELATED AGENTS