ProductFREEACCESS AVAILABLEFC-PROD-007
Feature Claw
feature-claw
v0.2.0May 22, 2026Feature definition — user stories, acceptance criteria, and prioritization frameworks that ship the right things
"Just add a settings page" is where scope creep begins, simplicity dies, and engineering estimates triple overnight. I write PRDs with measurable success criteria—not vague wishes—and define acceptance criteria sharp enough that QA and engineering never argue about whether something is "done." Edge cases get cataloged before they become production bugs, and technical spikes de-risk the unknowns before you commit to a timeline.
OpenClaw
Hermes
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
Windsurf
Aider
OllamaPRIMARY ACTION
COMPATIBLE WITH
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodex+4
8 compatible tools5 output formats
When to Use
- Translate vague ideas into implementation scope
- Prepare user stories with acceptance criteria
- Set realistic priorities before coding
- Create an actionable launch roadmap
Compatible Frameworks
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodexCursorWindsurfAiderOllama8 TOOLS
Quality Gates
- Requirements without ambiguity
- Testable acceptance criteria
- Edge cases enumerated and addressed
- Error states fully defined
- Dependencies documented and tracked
5 GATES DEFINED
Expected Outputs
Feature PRD with Measurable Success CriteriaTechnical Feasibility Assessment and Spike ResultsScope Boundary Decision Log (In-Scope / Out-of-Scope)Edge Case Catalog with Expected BehaviorsAcceptance Criteria Specification in Gherkin Format
Native exports per tool
OpenClaw10 files
openclaw/AGENTS.mdopenclaw/SOUL.mdopenclaw/TOOLS.md+7 moreHermes5 files
hermes/skills/flickclaw/feature-claw/SKILL.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/feature-claw/references/workflow.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/feature-claw/references/quality-gates.md+2 moreClaude Code6 files
claude-code/CLAUDE.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/feature-claw/SKILL.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/feature-claw/references/workflow.md+3 moreCodex5 files
codex/AGENTS.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/feature-claw/codex.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/feature-claw/workflow.md+2 moreCursor3 files
cursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-feature-claw.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-feature-claw-workflow.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-feature-claw-quality-gates.mdcWindsurf3 files
windsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-feature-claw.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-feature-claw-workflow.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-feature-claw-quality-gates.mdAider3 files
aider/CONVENTIONS.mdaider/aider.mdaider/.aider.conf.ymlOllama4 files
ollama/Modelfileollama/system-prompt.mdollama/template.md+1 moreInstall Commands
Install the FlickClaw CLI, then select your AI agent framework below to get the correct install command.
Step 1: Install CLI (one-time)
npm install -g @flickclaw/cli@latestStep 2: Select Framework
OpenClaw
npm exec --yes @flickclaw/cli@latest -- install feature-claw --target openclawDownload as ZIP
Example Prompt
Try this prompt with Feature Claw to see what it can do:
Analyze the current feature set and prioritize the next 3 features by user impact and effort. Create Feature PRD with Measurable Success Criteria, Technical Feasibility Assessment and Spike Results, Scope Boundary Decision Log (In-Scope / Out-of-Scope) with clear rationale.Example Output
IllustrativeWhat a typical Feature Claw report looks like:
# Feature Claw — Assessment Report **Project**: feature-prioritization **Context**: a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities **Generated**: 2026-07-10 ## Executive Summary The Feature Claw completed its review of feature-prioritization (a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities). 3 findings were identified with concrete remediation steps. All quality gates were verified before delivery. ## Findings | # | Severity | Area | Finding | Recommended Action | |---|----------|------|---------|-------------------| | 1 | **P1** | Scope | 12 features lack acceptance criteria | Define criteria and success metrics before scheduling | | 2 | **P2** | Dependencies | Team B blocked on Team A for 4 upcoming items | Resequence to parallelize independent work streams | | 3 | **P2** | Metrics | No success metric defined for Q2 initiatives | Add North Star metric and leading indicators per initiative | ## Quality Gates - [✓] PRD includes measurable success criteria (not just launch metrics) - [✓] Edge cases documented with expected behavior for each - [✓] Technical spike completed for high-risk or novel components ## Outputs Generated - **Feature PRD with Measurable Success Criteria**: Included in the report above. - **Technical Feasibility Assessment and Spike Results**: Included in the report above. - **Scope Boundary Decision Log (In-Scope / Out-of-Scope)**: Included in the report above. - **Edge Case Catalog with Expected Behaviors**: Included in the report above. - **Acceptance Criteria Specification in Gherkin Format**: Included in the report above. ## Validation - [x] All quality gates passed (3/3) - [x] 3 findings documented with severity and remediation - [x] 5 output sections generated - [x] Evidence collected and referenced --- *This is an illustrative example output from FlickClaw. Results vary based on project context.*
RELATED AGENTS