ProductPROPRO REQUIREDFC-PROD-006
Competitive Claw
competitive-claw
v0.2.0May 22, 2026Competitive analysis — market gap identification, positioning maps, and feature comparison matrices with sourced data
Your competitor's public roadmap tells you more about their fears than their plans—if you know how to read between the lines. I build competitive battle cards backed by primary-source evidence from pricing pages, changelogs, and documentation changelogs, not recycled analyst reports. Feature teardowns include explicit win/loss context so you're not just comparing checkboxes—you're understanding positioning.
OpenClaw
Hermes
Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
Windsurf
Aider
OllamaPRIMARY ACTION
Unlock with ProCOMPATIBLE WITH
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodex+4
8 compatible tools5 output formats
When to Use
- Translate vague ideas into implementation scope
- Prepare user stories with acceptance criteria
- Set realistic priorities before coding
- Create an actionable launch roadmap
Compatible Frameworks
OpenClawHermesClaude CodeCodexCursorWindsurfAiderOllama8 TOOLS
Quality Gates
- Comparisons backed by evidence
- Gaps validated against user needs
- Real differentiated positioning
- SWOT balanced and honest
- No unsupported competitive claims
5 GATES DEFINED
Expected Outputs
Competitive Battle Card per Top-3 CompetitorFeature Teardown Report with Win/Loss ContextPricing Benchmark Analysis with Trend LinesWin/Loss Pattern Analysis from Customer InterviewsMarket Positioning Map
Native exports per tool
OpenClaw10 files
openclaw/AGENTS.mdopenclaw/SOUL.mdopenclaw/TOOLS.md+7 moreHermes5 files
hermes/skills/flickclaw/competitive-claw/SKILL.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/competitive-claw/references/workflow.mdhermes/skills/flickclaw/competitive-claw/references/quality-gates.md+2 moreClaude Code6 files
claude-code/CLAUDE.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/competitive-claw/SKILL.mdclaude-code/.claude/skills/competitive-claw/references/workflow.md+3 moreCodex5 files
codex/AGENTS.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/competitive-claw/codex.mdcodex/.flickclaw/agents/competitive-claw/workflow.md+2 moreCursor3 files
cursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-competitive-claw.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-competitive-claw-workflow.mdccursor/.cursor/rules/flickclaw-competitive-claw-quality-gates.mdcWindsurf3 files
windsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-competitive-claw.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-competitive-claw-workflow.mdwindsurf/.windsurf/rules/flickclaw-competitive-claw-quality-gates.mdAider3 files
aider/CONVENTIONS.mdaider/aider.mdaider/.aider.conf.ymlOllama4 files
ollama/Modelfileollama/system-prompt.mdollama/template.md+1 moreInstall Commands
Install the FlickClaw CLI, then select your AI agent framework below to get the correct install command.
Step 1: Install CLI (one-time)
npm install -g @flickclaw/cli@latestStep 2: Select Framework
OpenClaw
npm exec --yes @flickclaw/cli@latest -- install competitive-claw --target openclawDownload as ZIP
Example Prompt
Try this prompt with Competitive Claw to see what it can do:
Analyze the current feature set and prioritize the next 3 features by user impact and effort. Create Competitive Battle Card per Top-3 Competitor, Feature Teardown Report with Win/Loss Context, Pricing Benchmark Analysis with Trend Lines with clear rationale.Example Output
IllustrativeWhat a typical Competitive Claw report looks like:
# Competitive Claw — Assessment Report **Project**: feature-prioritization **Context**: a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities **Generated**: 2026-07-10 ## Executive Summary The Competitive Claw completed its review of feature-prioritization (a product backlog with 80+ items across 3 teams with conflicting priorities). 3 findings were identified with concrete remediation steps. All quality gates were verified before delivery. ## Findings | # | Severity | Area | Finding | Recommended Action | |---|----------|------|---------|-------------------| | 1 | **P1** | Scope | 12 features lack acceptance criteria | Define criteria and success metrics before scheduling | | 2 | **P2** | Dependencies | Team B blocked on Team A for 4 upcoming items | Resequence to parallelize independent work streams | | 3 | **P2** | Metrics | No success metric defined for Q2 initiatives | Add North Star metric and leading indicators per initiative | ## Quality Gates - [✓] Every competitive claim cites primary source evidence (pricing page, docs, changelog) - [✓] Feature comparison matrix refreshed within last quarter - [✓] SWOT analysis backed by verified win/loss customer data ## Outputs Generated - **Competitive Battle Card per Top-3 Competitor**: Included in the report above. - **Feature Teardown Report with Win/Loss Context**: Included in the report above. - **Pricing Benchmark Analysis with Trend Lines**: Included in the report above. - **Win/Loss Pattern Analysis from Customer Interviews**: Included in the report above. - **Market Positioning Map**: Included in the report above. ## Validation - [x] All quality gates passed (3/3) - [x] 3 findings documented with severity and remediation - [x] 5 output sections generated - [x] Evidence collected and referenced --- *This is an illustrative example output from FlickClaw. Results vary based on project context.*
RELATED AGENTS